PRIMUS - 2006 - They Can't All Be Zingers
example of the Commission to combat fraud, by the way , well illustrates the state of "Public version of WWII history." Going to the commission twice a year. The rest of the acts are often in the genre of "franchise", just putting your neck on the books is very different scientific quality. The most unfortunate result of this approach - work under the name "the 70-th anniversary of the Second World War", released under the auspices of the Commission in 2009. We see in it a dump materials, some of which are not removed even underscores from Wikipedia (that is, they are obtained by Conventional Copy + Paste). And thanks to the mechanical addition of phrases from different sources meet there - passages such as "soldiers of the Red Army carried out a disciplined Command decisions. Brought up in the spirit of atheism, they frequently got drunk and arranged fights. "
on state strategy is not explicitly drawn. However, it speaks not only about the absence of senior government officials interest in recent history, how about the sad, dilapidated state of the domestic historical science in general.
After power when it is confronted with a problem, chooses from the pack that rests on her desk. And nothing on the table No: a unified concept of the twentieth century is not at all, it is formulated. When the state says academic historians: "Well, come on, we would like to hear your position, then the answer is very often asked: "What do you want to hear?" - and wait for instructions. They, figuratively speaking, not statesmen, they are loyalists. And in this also a huge problem.
science of history, our far behind Western in quite practical things: it simply dropped the level. This is not surprising: if Do not feed the parrot, he will die. Academic structure in the absence of funding does not work.
in power understand that "construct" academic historians under certain ideokraticheskogo concept, of course, you can. But the result will be that the task they perform is still not able to. They are for tactical expediency - not important what he did, but as reported - would create a chaotic something from which the hair stand on end. Example - the same work, "the 70 anniversary of the beginning Second World War.
But the government does not understand why he even history. Planning for three or four moves ahead, unfortunately, is missing. Therefore, when I say that, "Vlasov" version of war history in general was defeated, I mean, it's made public. It is itself, without government help to disassemble and throw the marginal concept. Although the total formal presentation about what happened here in the last century, once again, have so far not.
Dyukov: "Anti-Soviet version of Russian history of the XX century is impossible
0 comments:
Post a Comment