MUSIC - I think
ABOUT
* Amateur and professional hear music differently. And love, in large extent - different music. Of course, this difference depends on the level and degree of readiness of the Professional Amateur.
I - amateur, prepared by some a "medium" level.
Adults tried to learn (piano). Took lessons. Put your hands, drove Gagnon (of course, the first page), read music theory. For 4-6 hours each day, night after work ... Enough for 3 months. That's all.
past never missed a standing gig at the conservatory. Now it is very expensive.
* Addiction in music depends on genes, upbringing, temperament, age, etc., etc. On
tastes - argue.
Composers and Performers (my series)
1-st row (they have 90-100% of "my" Music):
Tchaikovsky, Chopin, Beethoven, Lisitsian ... Duke Ellington, Glenn Miller, ... Elvis Presley, ... R. Pauls, ... Vladimir Vysotsky, B. Okudzhava, Makarevich, A. Pugacheva, Matvienko-Lube, ...
2-nd row (50-89%):
Liszt, Bruch, Brahms, Verdi, Saint-Saens, Rachmaninoff, Sviridov, Shostakovich, ... Sil Austin, ... Springsteen, Ray Conniff, Clayderman, Tukhmanov, Y. Vizbor, T. Gverdtsiteli,
third number (5-49%):
Mozart, Mendelssohn, Wagner R, Schnittke, Korndorf, ... Chris Rea, ... B. Choi, Rosenbaum, Kamburova ...
4-th series (1-4%):
Vivaldi, Bach, Bruckner, Schubert, Prokofiev ... Beatles ...
(was in a hurry, will correct and supplement).
THAT I LOVE
* In my music library: 90% academic (85% - instrumental, 5% - operator), 3% - jazz, 3% - pop, 2% - "soft" rock, a 2% stop.
* I envy those who will hear the 1-st the end or the 6 th Symphony by Tchaikovsky, 2 nd or 3 rd conc Rachmaninoff for the first time. For me - it's the top, above the class they are not. But as they have torn ears! Remains very sorry.
* collecting music only high quality recording. If even a genius, but he wrote long and bad - do not take. Some
reject the computer processing of response of old records - "I want an authentic sound." In the old records he once again has nothing to do with the true, because have not yet done multichannel recording, microphones and instruments were imperfect, record reinstall, etc.
* listening to recordings of his music library, without changing the tags, name files, I enter their assessments of the quality of writing (Kz) and the attractiveness of the composition (Pr). Evaluate on a scale from minus (-) and plus (p = +). For example, Pr4p a Pr4 + (internet does not allow "+" sign, so it is).
* In my computer right now - 215 Gb of music. Records as lossless, and to MP3 (for listening in the car).
not like it. Do not accept:
Baroque organ, harpsichord, Stravinsky, tenors ... Jazz Latino, Lagutenko (and similar), blatnyak ... (List not exhaustive).
uninteresting (sometimes popular, but more "random" names - sometimes on a recommendation to download and listen to - not mine »):
Austin Renee
Benny Carter
Berry
Classical Jazz Quartet
Dean Martin
Garou
Gila
Morgan State University Choir
Mylène Farmer
Planet Earth
Rolling Stones
Shirley Bassey
genius, idol - my "SPOON Tar ":
* Shtokolov. Powerful voice, the nature of data. But it is not polished - an inflexible, often unnecessarily pulls malochastotnoe vibrato, limps pronunciation -" o "instead of "A", "y" instead of ". Irritating very noticeable narcissism.
* MOZART. In the fast parts of it can and florid, elegant, but passionless. Do not touch them. Perceive only the slow part.
* Kozlovsky, Lemeshev ... These sugary nightingales - the horror! I can only listen to the tenor of Italians.
* VALLEY-DZHAZISTKA. Thin high voice, almost a squeak - this is jazz?
SEARCH interesting music
* Search for interesting tracks / songs - the labor and time (which is so lacking!). We are talking about veschyah interesting but the existence of which has not yet heard (if you know what, it's not difficult to find).
* Unfortunately there is a site where we could clearly find "like-minded people and share findings (albeit in the form of recommendations). For example, Last.fm works ugly - it is worth mentioning someone famously machine fill up all that they have to eat.
* A Search Scheme like-minded people could, for example. work well.
call, 10 (20, 30) the best in your opinion of tracks / songs. If someone they are also the best - we can hope that in the rest of your recommendations will be close.
* At Torrents offered to organize such a club. Rejected.
Maybe it has something to do on your own blog? Therefore, so clearly trying to show my passion and my music library.
SYMBOLS title track of my music library:
with - concert
Kz - the recording quality (P = +). For example, Kz4p it Kz4 +
Pr - the attractiveness of the composition
sl - is complicated. Music that requires training, the environment and attention.
SjI - squeezed in MP3 I myself
iVin - himself digitized own vinyl
KO - made computer processing
m - slow tempo
s - average tempo
b - a fast tempo
hi - well izvestnjt
mi - little izvestnjt
ni - neizvestnjt
hni - well-known, but unknown version
My evaluating the attractiveness of music (Pr):
attracts if present:
1. The original guitar tunes.
2. The original interesting rhythm.
3. Original interesting oranzhirovka (orchestration).
4. Interesting execution
If the composition contains any one, two, three or all four points, then assess suitability as Pr4, Pr4p, Pr5-and Pr5. Clearly, that is something more, something less. So that this scheme is conventional, but it is still around, allows to capture the quality (of course, purely personal opinion).
My Rating The recording quality (Kz):
Kz5, Kz4r - to a greater or lesser degree - the "transparency" and "space", deep bass, clear highs. Record is a great pleasure
Kz4 - smooth and sufficiently wide frequency range. It is quite possible to listen
Kz4-- there are some drawbacks, but you can listen
Kz3r, Kz3 - drawbacks are significant. Worth to listen only when a special interest in a particular execution. This is most often long-standing record neotrestavrirovannye Artists (Rachmaninoff, Chaliapin, early jazz musicians ...)
My COMPILATIONS
No composers or authors-mspolniteley in which all would be interested. And many people - quite a bit.
Music is not my background I absolutely do not want to listen to mediocre or even slightly good.
Therefore, listen to music all choose the most interesting (estestvenno. for my taste) and draw up a Collection (in MP3, each volume on a CD - about 6:00 playing time). Kz4 and above.
now being formed are:
Sb_N1_VJ-L-mi - All genres-best-little-known (Pr4p and above).
Sb_N3_VJ-L-hi - All genres-the best-well-known (Pr4p and above).
Sb_N5_Cl-L-mi - Classic-best-little-known (on vocals, opera) (Dept. of Random th).
Sb_N7_Cl-L-hi - Classic-better-good Math-Noe (on vocals, opera) (Pr4p and above) (Dept. of Random-th)
Sb_N9_Vo-H - vocals, opera-Pr4 and above (maloizv and Math) (Dept. of the large Random th).
Sb_N11_AkRs - Audiobooks auditions.
Sb_N20-Cl-H - Class (Aut)-Pr4 and above (in alphabetical order. Int Shuffle without var mgr. Maloizv and Math).
Sb_N25_J-H - Jazz-Pr4 and above (maloizv and Math).
Sb_N30_R-H - Rock-Pr4 and above (maloizv and Math).
Sb_N35_Ru-H - Russian chanson, song, romance-Pr4 and above (maloizv and Math)
Sb_N40_ZP-H - Zaruba pop-Pr4 and above (maloizv and Math)
Sb_N45_Cl-PH (three-four first beech family) - Classical-personalities-Pr4 and above (hist var mgr )
notion of "little known" Of course, conditional. Recently, for example, "combed" 48 Albums by Chris Rea. Discovered many interesting compositions that have never been repeated, not included in any "Best", "Gold", etc. To me they were new. Well, a big fan of Chris Rea probably familiar with.
In particular theme showing two of my Collection. They are temporary, make out.
PROGRESS
Blog just started to make out.
Over time, submit a detailed content of my music library.
0 comments:
Post a Comment